What to Make of a Low-Volatility, Low-Correlation Market

By Gerardo Manzo and Jeffrey N. Saret on June 22, 2017
Man in suit walking through a street with a bunch of red pillars around him

Investors seem to expect benign market conditions to continue, but they should remain aware of the historical tendency for rapid, positive shifts in volatility measures to occur.

Is historically low volatility in U.S. stocks a sign of investor confidence or complacency? With the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) recently hitting an all-time low, and pairwise correlations among U.S. shares similarly subdued, the answer remains elusive. Regardless, markets may not be pricing in the risk of a broad, systemic shock to the U.S. equity market. It is worth remembering, however, that both volatility and correlations have a history of suddenly spiking higher.

The current low-volatility environment

The VIX fell to a 23-year low on June 9, 2017 (Chart 1), accelerating a year-long downtrend that has accompanied the S&P 500 Index’s steady climb. The recent performance of the VIX may suggest that investors seem to have mostly cast aside their fears, remaining undaunted even in the face of an aging bull market and increasing valuations (e.g., PE ratios).

VIX and Implied Correlation in the S&P 500

It is possible to try to make general inferences as to why the VIX has been falling so precipitously, but pinpointing exact causes is difficult. One measure offers important context, however. The average 30-day implied pairwise correlation of stocks in the S&P 500 (Chart 1- right y-axis) has also been falling since 2012, a downtrend that has only grown more pronounced over the past year.

Low pairwise correlations in a low-volatility market environment may suggest that investors expect low volatility in the short term and/or that any market shocks will have a low probability of becoming systemic. In other words, investors may believe that the biggest near-term risk they face is a shock that affects only a discrete slice of the S&P 500, a risk that can theoretically be mitigated through diversification.

Additionally, individual stocks have become, on average, less volatile since the 2008 financial crisis, and especially so over the past year. Chart 2 plots the aggregate cross-sectional volatility for more than 1000 of the most liquid (based on trading volume) U.S.-listed equities. Once again, the data may imply that investors have adopted an increasingly sanguine outlook. A negative reaction to any approaching shock, investors seem to believe, will likely manifest meaningfully in only a narrow subset of the overall market.

Cross-sectional Average of Single Name Implied Volatilities of The Most Liquid names

Low-volatility and the potential for sudden changes

Whether historically low VIX levels, pairwise correlations, and idiosyncratic volatilities should reassure investors or militate greater caution depends on one’s perspective. Optimistically, markets could accurately be signaling a continuing period of relatively low—or at least contained—risk, generally an environment conducive to the beneficial effects of diversification that offer potentially greater rewards for skilled stock-pickers.

The alternative view is potentially more troubling. The data may indicate that markets underestimate the probability of a systemic shock. All two of the charts above show a tendency, since the 2008 financial crisis, for periods of falling volatility (or correlation, as the case may be) to precede sudden, sharp spikes higher. All three series exhibit relatively high skew and kurtosis (Chart 3).

Skewness and Kurtosis of Daily Changes in Vix, Implied correlation, and cross-sectional average volatility

Potential implications

While none of these measures speak directly to the timing of sudden moves in either direction, investors should remain cognizant of the historical tendency for rapid, positive shifts to occur. When they do, diversification may not prove as effective as expected, with 2008 being an extreme example of this phenomenon.

Are investors right to be so sanguine about near-term market risks, or are they being complacent? Only time will tell which interpretation is correct, but it is unclear whether investors’ portfolios are ready for the latter scenario, should it come to pass.

Download PDF — 1.02 MB

The views expressed above are not necessarily the views of Two Sigma Investments, LP or any of its affiliates (collectively, “Two Sigma”).  The information presented above is only for informational and educational purposes and is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or other instruments. Additionally, the above information is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for investment, accounting, legal or tax advice. Two Sigma makes no representations, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information, and the reader accepts all risks in relying on the above information for any purpose whatsoever.  For other important disclaimers and disclosures, download the full article.

Related Articles